Written by

Jacqueline Ashom

Partner

The exemption is narrower in practice than the headlines suggested. A reading of the qualifying tests, with worked examples for owner-managed companies.

Discuss this matter →

The reform package was reported as a broad reprieve for small business. Read against the qualifying tests, the exemption is considerably narrower than the coverage suggested, and several owner-managed companies that assumed they had fallen outside it have not.

The threshold is not a single number

The relief does not turn on turnover alone. It operates through a combination of gross turnover, the nature of the activity carried on, and, critically, whether the company forms part of a larger group or has related-party dealings that must be aggregated. A company reporting turnover comfortably below the headline figure can still fall outside the exemption because of the second and third limbs.

Worked example one: the single-entity trader

A company with one shareholder-director, annual turnover well under the threshold, no subsidiaries and no related-party transactions is the clearest case. It qualifies. Its obligation is to file, claim the treatment, and retain records supporting the turnover figure. Filing remains mandatory; the exemption relieves the liability, not the return.

Worked example two: the group member

A company with the same turnover, but which is one of three entities under common ownership, is in a different position. Where the group's combined turnover exceeds the threshold, the relief is not available to any member simply because each member is individually small. Clients frequently structure into multiple entities for commercial reasons and are surprised to find those reasons are irrelevant to the aggregation test.

Splitting a business into smaller companies has never been an effective threshold strategy, and this reform does not make it one.

Worked example three: professional services

Certain activities are excluded from the relief regardless of size. Where a company's income is derived substantially from professional or consultancy services, the exemption may be unavailable even at modest turnover. This is the limb that has caught the largest number of clients, because it is the one least reflected in general commentary.

Practical steps


Establish the turnover figure on the statutory basis, not the management-accounts basis


Map every related entity under common control and aggregate before concluding


Test the activity against the excluded categories before claiming relief


File in every case; a claimed exemption on an unfiled return is not an exemption

Where the position is genuinely uncertain, the conservative course is to file on the ordinary basis and seek a ruling, rather than claim relief and defend it later at interest.

This note is a general commentary on the law as at the date of publication. It is not legal advice and should not be relied upon in place of advice on your own facts. For guidance on a specific matter, speak to one of our lawyers.